http://www.gurdjieff-con.net/2009/01/06/ait-versus-oit/ Debriefing the Gurdjieff work Tue, 31 Jan 2012 15:41:49 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 http://www.gurdjieff-con.net/2009/01/06/ait-versus-oit/comment-page-1/#comment-30006 nemo Wed, 07 Jan 2009 03:08:02 +0000 http://www.gurdjieff-con.net/?p=383#comment-30006 One problem with the OIT hypothesis is the tricky case of Anatolian Indo-Hittite which has to be the earliest daughter branch off of the proto-Indo-European, or else a parallel at the earliest state of archaic proto-Indo-European, and this doesn't resemble the Indo-Aryan so closely. This is very complicated stuff and therefore the OIT thesis, which looks convincing on one level, still has a ways to go before it can square with the rest of the Indo-European issues. (As far as I know....) One problem with the OIT hypothesis is the tricky case of Anatolian Indo-Hittite which has to be the earliest daughter branch off of the proto-Indo-European, or else a parallel at the earliest state of archaic proto-Indo-European, and this doesn’t resemble the Indo-Aryan so closely. This is very complicated stuff and therefore the OIT thesis, which looks convincing on one level, still has a ways to go before it can square with the rest of the Indo-European issues.
(As far as I know….)

]]> http://www.gurdjieff-con.net/2009/01/06/ait-versus-oit/comment-page-1/#comment-29921 Darwiniana » AIT versus OIT Tue, 06 Jan 2009 21:52:10 +0000 http://www.gurdjieff-con.net/?p=383#comment-29921 [...] on AIT versus OIT (Aryan Invasion theory and Out of India theory), with a link to a review of a new book on defending [...] [...] on AIT versus OIT (Aryan Invasion theory and Out of India theory), with a link to a review of a new book on defending [...]

]]>