05.02.09
Sam Harris at edge.org, and Aleister Crowley
Sam Harris at Edge.org (unwittingly) makes a statement about our discussion here.
If I have one quibble with Dyson, it is that he has been far too modest in drawing out the implications of his argument. He is, of course, right to declare that “science and religion are here to stay.” But magic is here to stay too, George; Africa is full of it. Is there a conflict between scientific rationality and a belief in magic spells? Specifically, is there a conflict between believing that epilepsy is a result of abnormal neural activity and believing that it is a sign of demonic possession? Dogmatists like Coyne and Dennett clearly think so. They don’t realize, as Dyson must, that the more one understands neurology, the more one will understand—and honor—demonology. Have Coyne and Dennett read the work of sophisticated magicians like Aleister Crowley or Eliphas Levi? Don’t count on it. Ask yourself, how could matter conflict with spirit in any way? Answer: it cannot. Forgive me, but I find it embarrassing to have to explain these things to people who are supposed be well educated.
nemo said,
05.02.09 at 7:19 pm
Good comments.
It is no wonder people are confused, and that the debate over evolution is so virulent.
nemo said,
06.02.09 at 3:24 pm
Technical note: I almost missed one comment because it had more than two links (it goes into moderation). I think I will change that.
Meanwhile, don’t worry: links are fine, but the comment might be delayed in appearing.