<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blavatsky data</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gurdjieff-con.net/2009/08/20/blavatsky-data/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gurdjieff-con.net/2009/08/20/blavatsky-data/</link>
	<description>Debriefing the Gurdjieff work</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 15:41:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Solar Hero</title>
		<link>http://www.gurdjieff-con.net/2009/08/20/blavatsky-data/comment-page-1/#comment-35208</link>
		<dc:creator>Solar Hero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 17:32:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gurdjieff-con.net/?p=830#comment-35208</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve done a lot of research on H.P.B., here&#039;s my two-cents.

The historical and geographical position of Russia meant that a lot of Asian literature made its way to her...Blavatsky&#039;s father had all kinds of Tibetan and other Buddhist and Hindu texts in their library, and young Blavatsky devoured them, recapitulating them, not without some originality on her own part of course, in her Secret Doctrine and Isis Revealed. 

After you sort-of absorb the Theosophical worldview -- you must read the unabridged editions! -- its not hard at all to trace Gurdjieff&#039;s &quot;system&quot; from its contents. Further, Ouspensky, who may be more responsible for the &quot;system&quot; than G., was the President of the Theosophical Society in St. Petersburg in his Tertium Organum years.

I do believe that G. and O. were much more practical, and where they improved upon HPB was in their focus on individual practice and experience. 

I highly recommend Crowley&#039;s commentary on HPB&#039;s The Voice of Silence.

Great blog, important work, you all rock.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve done a lot of research on H.P.B., here&#8217;s my two-cents.</p>
<p>The historical and geographical position of Russia meant that a lot of Asian literature made its way to her&#8230;Blavatsky&#8217;s father had all kinds of Tibetan and other Buddhist and Hindu texts in their library, and young Blavatsky devoured them, recapitulating them, not without some originality on her own part of course, in her Secret Doctrine and Isis Revealed. </p>
<p>After you sort-of absorb the Theosophical worldview &#8212; you must read the unabridged editions! &#8212; its not hard at all to trace Gurdjieff&#8217;s &#8220;system&#8221; from its contents. Further, Ouspensky, who may be more responsible for the &#8220;system&#8221; than G., was the President of the Theosophical Society in St. Petersburg in his Tertium Organum years.</p>
<p>I do believe that G. and O. were much more practical, and where they improved upon HPB was in their focus on individual practice and experience. </p>
<p>I highly recommend Crowley&#8217;s commentary on HPB&#8217;s The Voice of Silence.</p>
<p>Great blog, important work, you all rock.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amos Anon</title>
		<link>http://www.gurdjieff-con.net/2009/08/20/blavatsky-data/comment-page-1/#comment-35203</link>
		<dc:creator>Amos Anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 08:07:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gurdjieff-con.net/?p=830#comment-35203</guid>
		<description>I have been following your postings for several months now. Although I see your work as intellegently composed, I am at a loss to determine exactly where you stand. For example, you seem to have mixed emotions regarding Blavatsky (as do I), but are you simply &#039;thinking out loud&#039;? That I can sympathize with, as I have the same habit. In regards to Bennett, he was excommed by THE Foundation, but that does not make him wrong. What exactly is your position on the Gurdjieff teachings? I have a number of essays on related issues, focusing on awakening (i. e., Gurdjieffs contention that &quot;Man is asleep.&quot;) and will be launching a blog soon. Perhaps we can initiate an dialogue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been following your postings for several months now. Although I see your work as intellegently composed, I am at a loss to determine exactly where you stand. For example, you seem to have mixed emotions regarding Blavatsky (as do I), but are you simply &#8216;thinking out loud&#8217;? That I can sympathize with, as I have the same habit. In regards to Bennett, he was excommed by THE Foundation, but that does not make him wrong. What exactly is your position on the Gurdjieff teachings? I have a number of essays on related issues, focusing on awakening (i. e., Gurdjieffs contention that &#8220;Man is asleep.&#8221;) and will be launching a blog soon. Perhaps we can initiate an dialogue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

