<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nietzsche and atheism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gurdjieff-con.net/2009/10/22/nietzsche-and-atheism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gurdjieff-con.net/2009/10/22/nietzsche-and-atheism/</link>
	<description>Debriefing the Gurdjieff work</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 15:41:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Gurdjieff Con &#187; Samkhya and cosmological scale</title>
		<link>http://www.gurdjieff-con.net/2009/10/22/nietzsche-and-atheism/comment-page-1/#comment-35403</link>
		<dc:creator>The Gurdjieff Con &#187; Samkhya and cosmological scale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 16:58:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gurdjieff-con.net/?p=1052#comment-35403</guid>
		<description>[...] Comment on Nietzsche and atheism James said, 23.10.09 at 8:30 am [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Comment on Nietzsche and atheism James said, 23.10.09 at 8:30 am [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.gurdjieff-con.net/2009/10/22/nietzsche-and-atheism/comment-page-1/#comment-35402</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 14:30:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gurdjieff-con.net/?p=1052#comment-35402</guid>
		<description>&quot;But, appropriately, he dares only the phrase ‘unfathomable’ as he reaches the highest triad in the Samkhya series, beyond which some ‘point’ of unity is by defintion posited by the system.&quot;

Do you mean the most refined state of prakriti (I guess it would be Buddhi using the terminology of the Samkhya)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;But, appropriately, he dares only the phrase ‘unfathomable’ as he reaches the highest triad in the Samkhya series, beyond which some ‘point’ of unity is by defintion posited by the system.&#8221;</p>
<p>Do you mean the most refined state of prakriti (I guess it would be Buddhi using the terminology of the Samkhya)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

