28.11.09
Lozowick’s criminal book, Spiritual Slavery
We keep this testimonials to how Lozowick is such a sweet guy. The use of the term ’slave’ is significant.
Lozowick forever blew his wad when he wrote his book Spiritual Slavery in the seventies. That was how I came across him. He has since, I am told, disowned the book, but apparently not the assholel gurudom that went with it.
That book created an immense confusion in many people trying to sort out the question of the New Age and gurus. The book was an unforgivable lapse on Lozowick’s part, and all this apology for this asshole should be transferred to some consideration for those who were harmed by his idiocy.
mybrainisafleamarket said,
02.12.09 at 11:22 am
Here are some intriguing links. Make of it what you will. There appears to be some dispute as to whether Lozowick is indeeed recognized as being
a legitimate successor or mouthpiece for the dead guru Ramsuratkumar.
(Cough, cough)
(The links do not include a #2–I tried)
http://pages.intnet.mu/ramsurat/GauraKrishna/Lozowick1.html
http://pages.intnet.mu/ramsurat/GauraKrishna/Lozowick3.html
http://pages.intnet.mu/ramsurat/GauraKrishna/Lozowick4.html
However this notion that any publicity for a dead guru is good publicity sounds like yet more idiotic rationalization to me.
“All this is a game. All this is Bhagavan’s game, Bhagavan’s play. And these things were put here just to help people to get an ‘objective’ picture, to use their ‘buddhi’, their discrimination between truth and legend. As Krishna said, Lee was the perfect man for USA, for spreading Yogiji’s name there. And, even through books full of self-projection, Yogi Ramsuratkumar’s Name is spread. If people can come to Yogiji through Lee, it is perfect. Then, they will meet Truth, God, and forget all petty human legends. “