<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lozowick&#8217;s criminal book, Spiritual Slavery</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gurdjieff-con.net/2009/11/28/lozowicks-criminal-book-spiritual-slavery/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gurdjieff-con.net/2009/11/28/lozowicks-criminal-book-spiritual-slavery/</link>
	<description>Debriefing the Gurdjieff work</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 19:01:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: mybrainisafleamarket</title>
		<link>http://www.gurdjieff-con.net/2009/11/28/lozowicks-criminal-book-spiritual-slavery/comment-page-1/#comment-35532</link>
		<dc:creator>mybrainisafleamarket</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 17:22:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gurdjieff-con.net/?p=1275#comment-35532</guid>
		<description>Here are some intriguing links. Make of it what you will. There appears to be some dispute as to whether Lozowick is indeeed recognized as being
a legitimate successor or mouthpiece for the dead guru Ramsuratkumar. 

(Cough, cough)

(The links do not include a #2--I tried)

http://pages.intnet.mu/ramsurat/GauraKrishna/Lozowick1.html

http://pages.intnet.mu/ramsurat/GauraKrishna/Lozowick3.html

http://pages.intnet.mu/ramsurat/GauraKrishna/Lozowick4.html


However this notion that any publicity for a dead guru is good publicity sounds like yet more idiotic rationalization to me. 

&quot;All this is a game. All this is Bhagavan&#039;s game, Bhagavan&#039;s play. And these things were put here just to help people to get an &#039;objective&#039; picture, to use their &#039;buddhi&#039;, their discrimination between truth and legend. As Krishna said, Lee was the perfect man for USA, for spreading Yogiji&#039;s name there. And, even through books full of self-projection, Yogi Ramsuratkumar&#039;s Name is spread. If people can come to Yogiji through Lee, it is perfect. Then, they will meet Truth, God, and forget all petty human legends. &quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here are some intriguing links. Make of it what you will. There appears to be some dispute as to whether Lozowick is indeeed recognized as being<br />
a legitimate successor or mouthpiece for the dead guru Ramsuratkumar. </p>
<p>(Cough, cough)</p>
<p>(The links do not include a #2&#8211;I tried)</p>
<p><a href="http://pages.intnet.mu/ramsurat/GauraKrishna/Lozowick1.html" rel="nofollow">http://pages.intnet.mu/ramsurat/GauraKrishna/Lozowick1.html</a></p>
<p><a href="http://pages.intnet.mu/ramsurat/GauraKrishna/Lozowick3.html" rel="nofollow">http://pages.intnet.mu/ramsurat/GauraKrishna/Lozowick3.html</a></p>
<p><a href="http://pages.intnet.mu/ramsurat/GauraKrishna/Lozowick4.html" rel="nofollow">http://pages.intnet.mu/ramsurat/GauraKrishna/Lozowick4.html</a></p>
<p>However this notion that any publicity for a dead guru is good publicity sounds like yet more idiotic rationalization to me. </p>
<p>&#8220;All this is a game. All this is Bhagavan&#8217;s game, Bhagavan&#8217;s play. And these things were put here just to help people to get an &#8216;objective&#8217; picture, to use their &#8216;buddhi&#8217;, their discrimination between truth and legend. As Krishna said, Lee was the perfect man for USA, for spreading Yogiji&#8217;s name there. And, even through books full of self-projection, Yogi Ramsuratkumar&#8217;s Name is spread. If people can come to Yogiji through Lee, it is perfect. Then, they will meet Truth, God, and forget all petty human legends. &#8220;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
