23.05.09
DU commentary aborted?
I had projected some commentary, DU commentary, on Bennett’s The Dramatic Universe, but have failed to get it started. Part of the problem is the sheer scale of the work, and, more, the lack of time on my part.
So I may just collect a few notes on each aspect. Also, it is a problem if what is intended is a critique, when what is also needed is some degree of appreciation. We have pointed that out a number of times here: the rightness and confusion of Bennett.
Another problem is that you are close to the dragon here: this book adds to the mystique of Gurdjieff, with none of the blame that falls to Bennett, for his mixture of good and bad scholarship.
That’s always the problem with these followers. They should have known better than to have placed their work at the feet of the master (bation chief).
Moral: you get the whole ghost including the postage when you attack the sacred script.
Since we have attacked the sacred idiots t hemselves, I guess a little more VouDou won’t matter.